Again, I'd ask if you could please elaborate on your use case so we can better understand exactly what problem needs to be solved. If you believe you need to be that protective, why does Django offer a delete method on models.
If you need to construct a File yourself, the easiest way is to create one using a Python built-in file object: Since the underlying file is opened implicitly when accessing it, it may be unnecessary to call this method except to reset the pointer to the underlying file or to change the mode.
Changed 11 years ago by lakin. These specifics — 2. FileSystemStorage class which implements basic local filesystem file storage.
Again, I ask why Django provides Model. This callable accepts two parameters, instance and filename. Yes it has the potential to be more risky than using model queries in the traditional way, but you still enable the clients to be able to utilise it if they need it albeit with a lot of warnings.
That doesn't fit my needs unfortunately, because my use case warrants the preservation of the original end-user specified file name, i. There's already a setting for selecting the storage backend.
FileField instances are created in your database as varchar columns with a default max length of characters. FILES for more on the request object see the documentation for request and response objects. Using a FileField or an ImageField see below in a model takes a few steps: See Writing custom upload handlers for details on how you can customize or completely replace upload behavior.
Warning There are security risks if you are accepting uploaded content from untrusted users. This would look something like: I understand your and other core devs' reservations, but I don't agree that they are justification for not allowing the behaviour to exist natively, at all.
See File Upload Settings for details. This is a very useful feature, there is no automatic overwriting of files, it simply gives more flexibility to the programmer.
Your argument about allowing users to clobber existing files, it doesn't make sense to me. Be aware that files created in this way are not automatically closed. Hence, the curent code is already destructive. The following approach may be used to close files automatically: FILES will be empty.
The default form widget for this field is a ClearableFileInput. CharField has one extra required argument: Why not the same here. That was my suggestion in the past, and I do have to agree with Chris that it was a naive approach that has some pretty significant downsides. In addition to the API inherited from File such as read and writeFieldFile includes several methods that can be used to interact with the underlying file:.
If you are looking for a django "FileField" to use in your model with MAX_UPLOAD_SIZE and CONTENT_TYPE restrictions this post is for you. Immagine for example that you need to add the possibility to upload a PDF or Zip file in the django admin, but you want to be sure your client will upload only these two filetypes and not other ones.
You might also need the same functionality in the. I would store the code input in a CharField and then create a separate function that accesses the model and if the code does not contain any harmful methods it is then written to a file.
The concern about clobbering files is this: if user A uploads a file named "michaelferrisjr.com" for model instance A, then user B could upload a file of the same name for model instance B and it would overwrite the first file. In this article, we show how to override form data in the michaelferrisjr.com file in Django.
There are specific times when you either need to overwrite data that a user has entered into a form or extract data from the user to enter into a form that is not even visible to the end user.
This may be something. If a FileField file is being deleted it doesn't clean up a empty directory that might occur after deletion. This is only a issue if you use a dynamic path based on date.
If this is the case then you could create a lot of empty directories and/or nested empty directories. [Patch] Enable FileField/ImageField to be used as core field.
This has been long-standing issue in Django -- see, for example, the current image field uploads another copy and renames it rather than noticing the file already exists and asking to overwrite or use the existing file. Seems like a slightly complex issue.
Probably worth.Django filefield overwrite a file